DECENTRALIZED MEDIA IS LIVE POWERED BY
Banx Media Platform logo
HEALTHPublic HealthMental Health

Fifty Years of Illness, and a Choice Denied

Lisa Marr, who has lived with treatment-resistant mental illness for decades, describes the government's decision to bar MAID for mental illness as "a stab in the back."

K

Katherine Sarah

BEGINNER
5 min read
0 Views
Fifty Years of Illness, and a Choice Denied

For Lisa Marr, the news arrived not as a policy decision but as a personal betrayal. She has lived with mental illness for more than five decades, beginning at the age of five. She has seen more than twenty psychiatrists. She has been in weekly therapy for ten years. She retired as a paramedic in 2017, and the complex post-traumatic stress disorder that followed has not yielded to treatment. When Justice Minister Sean Fraser introduced a bill this week to indefinitely extend the ban on medical assistance in dying for people whose sole underlying condition is mental illness, Marr wrote him a letter. The phrase she used to describe her reaction was "a stab in the back" .

The bill, if passed, will stop a scheduled expansion of MAID access that had been delayed repeatedly since 2021, when the government asked a group of experts to study safeguards for introducing mental illness to the regime. Fraser told reporters that the decision reflects a lack of consensus about the irremediable nature of mental illnesses within the medical community, and concerns that inadequate access to mental health care could cause people to turn to MAID . The reasoning is careful, institutional, and grounded in genuine clinical uncertainty.

But for patients like Marr, the uncertainty is not abstract. "I believe that it should be an option for those that cannot get better no matter how much therapy, medications, and other treatments one endures for years and years," she wrote. "Fighting with every ounce of strength you can muster just to get out of bed each day is not quality of life" . The letter is not a demand for death. It is a claim to be seen, to have her suffering acknowledged as real and enduring rather than provisional.

The clinical debate is genuinely difficult. Dr. Sanjeev Sockalingam, chief medical officer at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, testified that studies show mental health diagnoses can change, and prognoses for people believed to be treatment-resistant are not reliable. He argued that MAID for mental illness should be available only when there are evidence-informed, consensus-based criteria for determining irremediability, and only within a well-resourced mental health system . These are not unreasonable conditions. They are, in fact, the conditions that many advocates for careful expansion have long demanded.

Dr. Tim Holland, who has provided MAID since it became legal, offered a different perspective. He acknowledged that defining irremediability is hard in mental health, but noted that it is also hard in physical medicine. "It's not like we don't have any understanding of these conditions," he said. "We do have a very robust understanding of mental health and what responds to certain treatments. It's a challenge in both and it's doable in both. To say that MAID assessors can't do it is false" . Holland's view is not that the system is ready, but that the difficulty of the task is not a reason to refuse it entirely.

Psychiatrist Dr. Mona Gupta raised a question that cuts deeper than the procedural debate. "As a society, we have chosen to pretend that people with severe, chronic, treatment-refractory mental disorders simply do not exist" . The exclusion, in her framing, is not a neutral safeguard. It is a decision about whose suffering counts, made by people who will not experience the consequences of that decision.

The bill will proceed through Parliament, and the debate will continue. For Marr, the outcome is not a matter of policy but of life. She will keep seeing her psychologist. She will keep taking her medications. She will keep fighting, as she has for fifty years, for a quality of life that has not arrived. And she will remember that when the government had a chance to offer her a choice, it chose instead to close the door.

Image note: The visuals accompanying this article were generated with artificial intelligence and do not depict the actual individuals or proceedings described.

Sources: The Canadian Press, St. Catharines Standard, CBC News, Radio-Canada International

Published by Banx Network. This article is part of the Banx decentralized media programme, powered by the BXE token on the XRP Ledger.

Decentralized Media

Powered by the XRP Ledger & BXE Token

This article is part of the XRP Ledger decentralized media ecosystem. Become an author, publish original content, and earn rewards through the BXE token.

Newsletter

Stay ahead of the news — and win free BXE every week

Subscribe for the latest news headlines and get automatically entered into our weekly BXE token giveaway.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Share this story

Help others stay informed about crypto news

Related articles

Keep exploring the latest stories.

View more
Chemical Spill At Ulsan Factory, Toxic Gas Exposure Hospitalizes Twelve Workers, Plant Evacuated

Chemical Spill At Ulsan Factory, Toxic Gas Exposure Hospitalizes Twelve Workers, Plant Evacuated

Twelve workers were hospitalized on October 28, 2026 after a chemical spill caused toxic gas exposure at a factory in Ulsan, South Korea.

Tragedy in Berkshire Park: Woman Fighting for Life After Horrific Three-Car Crash

Tragedy in Berkshire Park: Woman Fighting for Life After Horrific Three-Car Crash

A woman in her 30s is fighting for her life after being trapped in a severe three-car crash in Berkshire Park, Sydney. Rescuers freed her before she was rushed…

Six Kilos, Three Million Lives, and a Question of Supply

Six Kilos, Three Million Lives, and a Question of Supply

Halifax police seized 6.2 kg of fentanyl, 1,400 pills, and 10.5 liters of GHB from a Dartmouth home, the largest such seizure in Atlantic Canada, with three pe…