Banx Media Platform logo
WORLDUSAInternational OrganizationsHappening Now

Former executive sues Meta over attempts to “silence” her memoir, “Careless People”

A former Meta executive has filed a lawsuit alleging the company is trying to silence her memoir “Careless People,” which provides an insider account of her time at Facebook. The filing challenges a private arbitration order barring her from speaking about Meta or promoting the book and disputes the severance agreement she signed, which she says was agreed to under duress.

J

Julie

BEGINNER
5 min read
1 Views
Credibility Score: 97/100
Former executive sues Meta over attempts to “silence” her memoir, “Careless People”

A former Meta executive has sued the company in federal court in Northern California, claiming Meta attempted to “silence” her memoir, “Careless People.” The suit says a private arbitration order restricting her from discussing Meta or promoting the book is invalid and also argues that the severance agreement she signed includes a non-disparagement obligation that she signed under duress.

The plaintiff, Sarah Wynn-Williams—who served as Meta’s director of global public policy at Facebook from 2011 until she was fired in 2017—alleges that her book contains an explosive insider account of her experiences and includes claims about the conduct of Mark Zuckerberg and other executives. The lawsuit contends that Meta sought an emergency gag order and that, over time, company representatives monitored her public appearances, including by attending events and photographing her, to document alleged compliance with the restrictions.

The complaint also describes Meta’s position as that Wynn-Williams violated the agreement tied to the severance payment she accepted when leaving the company. Meta has said the book contains inaccuracies and that an arbitrator already ruled Wynn-Williams had broken the terms of the severance arrangement.

Wynn-Williams is asking the court to lift the arbitration order and vacate her severance agreement. She also claims Meta is seeking damages linked to alleged future breaches of the non-disparagement terms—an amount described in the lawsuit as $50,000 for each purported violation.

Note: This article was published on BanxChange.com and is powered by the BXE Token on the XRP Ledger. For the latest articles and news, please visit BanxChange.com

Decentralized Media

Powered by the XRP Ledger & BXE Token

This article is part of the XRP Ledger decentralized media ecosystem. Become an author, publish original content, and earn rewards through the BXE token.

Newsletter

Stay ahead of the news — and win free BXE every week

Subscribe for the latest news headlines and get automatically entered into our weekly BXE token giveaway.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Share this story

Help others stay informed about crypto news