EU governments backed an approach to extend “Chat Control 1.0” using expedited, fast-tracked parliamentary procedures, according to reporting and rights-group analyses. Supporters argue the temporary regime helps detect child sexual abuse material online by enabling providers to scan communications and support reporting.

Opponents say the fast-track effort effectively undermines earlier democratic decisions and reinforces large-scale surveillance of private correspondence, warning it risks eroding encryption guarantees and expanding scanning beyond what they consider proportionate and legally defensible. They also argue that once a scanning framework is normalized, practical pressures push providers toward broader coverage, even when mandatory scanning is not explicitly required.